MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Chemical Reaction Mechanisms
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

376 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
376 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 8

Labels cover 0 of 376 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 376 of 376 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Excess acidities
Robin A. Cox
2000· book-chapter· en· Advances in physical organic chemistry· Chemistry
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
afffundunlabeled
The Carbocation Rearrangement Mechanism, Clarified
Daniel J. S. Sandbeck, Daniel J. Markewich, Allan L. L. East
2016· article· en· The Journal of Organic Chemistry· Chemistry
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
30
citations
afffundunlabeled
<i>E</i>/<i>Z</i> Oxime Isomerism in PhC(NOH)CN
D. Scott Bohle, Zhijie Chua, Inna Perepichka, Kristopher A. Rosadiuk
2013· article· en· Chemistry - A European Journal· Chemistry
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
affunlabeled
Absolute reactivity of arylallyl carbocations
Geniece L. Hallett-Tapley, Frances L. Cozens, Norman P. Schepp
2008· article· en· Journal of Physical Organic Chemistry· Chemistry
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
25
citations
afffundunlabeled
Ab Initio Study of the Deamination of Formamidine
Christopher G. Flinn, Raymond A. Poirier, W. Andrzej Sokalski
2003· article· en· The Journal of Physical Chemistry A· Chemistry
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
24
citations
fundvenueno affunlabeled
Ab initio study of the decomposition of formamidine
Mansour H. Almatarneh, Christopher G. Flinn, Raymond A. Poirier
2005· article· en· Canadian Journal of Chemistry· Chemistry
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
24
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About