MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,360 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,360 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 28

Labels cover 12 of 1,360 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,360 of 1,360 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
Archives and the Public Good
2002· book· en· Praeger eBooks· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
26
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Recordkeeping and societal power 1 1This essay is a revised and expanded version of my ‘Archival Temples, Archival Prisons: Modes of Power and Protection’, Archival Science, 2, 2002, pp, 221-238, which was based on my ‘Empowering Archives: What Society Expects of Archivists’, Past Caring? What does Society Expect of Archivists? Proceedings of the Australian Society of Archivists Conference, Sydney 13-17 August 2002, Canberra, Australian Society of Archivists, 2002, pp, 11-27, and on a paper 1 presented in the seminar ‘Archives, Documentation and the Institutions of Social Memory’, organized by the Bentley Historical Library and the International Institute of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 31 January 2001.
Eric Ketelaar
2005· book-chapter· en· Archives· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
25
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Recordkeeping and accountability
Chris Hurley
2005· book-chapter· en· Archives· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
25
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Safety, Collaboration, and Empowerment
Kirsten Wright, Nicola Laurent
2021· article· en· Archivaria· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
23
citations
affunlabeled
Back to basics
Shannon Lucky, Craig Harkema
2018· article· en· Digital Library Perspectives· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
23
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Reflections on Archival User Studies
Hea Lim Rhee
2015· article· en· Reference & User Services Quarterly· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
New Approaches to Canadian Literary Archives
Catherine Hobbs
2006· article· en· Journal of Canadian Studies· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
19
citations
afffundunlabeled
Interacting with archival finding aids
Luanne Freund, Elaine G. Toms
2015· article· en· Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
19
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Encyclopedia of archival science
2016· article· en· Choice Reviews Online· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
18
citations
affunlabeled
ETHICAL FRAMEWORK FOR HERITAGE RECORDING SPECIALISTS APPLYINGDIGITAL WORKFLOWS FOR CONSERVATION
Mario Santana Quintero, Stephen Fai, Laurie Smith, A. Duer, Luigi Barazzetti
2019· article· en· ˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
18
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Archives and Technological Selection
Trond Lundemo
2014· article· en· Cinémas Revue d études cinématographiques· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
17
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The Archive as Dumpster
Mél Hogan
2015· article· en· Pivot A Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies and Thought· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
17
citations
affunlabeled
Retrocomputing as preservation and remix
Yuri Takhteyev, Quinn DuPont
2013· article· en· Library Hi Tech· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About