MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Science Technology & Human Values
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

84 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20022025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
84 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 2

Labels cover 32 of 84 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 84 of 84 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affaboutgemma · stsgpt · stsmodels agree
Displacement and Emplacement of Health Technology
Pascale Lehoux, Blake Poland, Geneviève Daudelin, Dave Holmes, Gavin J. Andrews
2008· article· en· Science Technology & Human Values· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
14
citations
affunlabeled
Representing Representation
Götz Hoeppe
2015· article· en· Science Technology & Human Values· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
12
citations
aboutno affgemma · stsgpt · stsmodels agree
Emergent Practices of an Environmental Standard
Isabel Shaw, Ritsuko Ozaki
2015· article· en· Science Technology & Human Values· Economics, Econometrics and Finance
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
11
citations
fundno affgemma · stsgpt · metaresearch+stsmodels split
Affective Labor in Integrative STS Research
T. Y. Branch, Geneviève Duché
2022· article· en· Science Technology & Human Values· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
8
citations
affgemma · stsgpt · stsmodels agree
Target Practice
Jon R. Lindsay
2017· article· en· Science Technology & Human Values· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
8
citations
affunlabeled
Introduction: Shifting Attention
Rebecca Jablonsky, Tero Karppi, Nick Seaver
2021· article· en· Science Technology & Human Values· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affunlabeled
The Algorithms of Mindfulness
Johannes Bruder
2021· article· en· Science Technology & Human Values· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
5
citations
afffundunlabeled
Do Artifacts Have Political Economy?
Kean Birch
2025· article· en· Science Technology & Human Values· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
4
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About