MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

379 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
379 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 8

Labels cover 0 of 379 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 379 of 379 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
Canadian Raising, Opacity, and Rephonemicization
William J. Idsardi
2006· article· en· The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Sociolinguistics and the Language Faculty
J. K. Chambers
2005· article· fr· The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Demonstrative Position in Michif
Nicole Rosen
2003· article· en· The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
affunlabeled
Hierarchy effects in copula constructions
Stefan Keine, Michael Wagner, Jessica Coon
2019· article· en· The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
afffundunlabeled
Decomposing definiteness: Evidence from Chuj
Justin Royer
2022· article· en· The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affunlabeled
Reflexive clitics are verbal, not pronominal
Martha McGinnis
2022· article· en· The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affunlabeled
Sociolinguistics and the Language Faculty
J. K. Chambers
2005· article· en· The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affunlabeled
The T-Extension Condition
Ivona Kučerová
2012· article· en· The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affunlabeled
Les infinitifs racines en langage enfantin
Marie Labelle
2000· article· en· The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About