MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,147 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,147 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 21 of 23

Labels cover 1 of 1,147 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,147 of 1,147 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
Center for Small Towns is decade old
2005· article· en· Digital Well (University of Minnesota Morris)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Intangible Cultural Heritage - Manual
2017· book· en· Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Urban scaling with censored data
Inês Figueira, Rayan Succar, Roni Barak Ventura, Maurizio Porfiri
2025· article· en· PLOS complex systems.· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Granular polymer nanocomposites
2013· dissertation· en· eScholarship@McGill (McGill)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundvenueaboutunlabeled
Making room for everyone
Alex Petric, Dawn C. Parker, Sean Geobey, Kirsten Wright
2024· article· en· Canadian Planning and Policy / Aménagement et politique au Canada· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueunlabeled
The search for the holy flaw
Ivan Zinger, Cherami Wichmann
2001· article· en· Canadian Journal of Criminology· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Clustering Ontario Renters
Anthony Piscitelli
2025· article· en· Journal of innovation in polytechnic education.· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
“I Didn’t Really Want to Leave”
Molly W. Metzger, Jane E. Oliphant
2019· article· en· Critical Social Work· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About