MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Software Engineering Research
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,468 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,468 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 22 of 70

Labels cover 10 of 3,468 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,468 of 3,468 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Completeness of a fact extractor
Yuan Lin, Richard C. Holt, Andrew J. Malton
2004· article· en· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
affunlabeled
Programmer-friendly Decompiled Java
Nomair A. Naeem, Laurie Hendren
2006· article· en· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
afffundunlabeled
Toward Understanding the Impact of Refactoring on Program Comprehension
Giulia Sellitto, Emanuele Iannone, Zadia Codabux, Valentina Lenarduzzi, Andrea De Lucia, Fabio Palomba +1 more
2022· article· en· 2022 IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER)· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
affunlabeled
Technical debt at the crossroads of research and practice
Davide Falessi, Philippe Kruchten, Robert L. Nord, İpek Özkaya
2014· article· en· ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
22
citations
affunlabeled
ApacheJIT
Hossein Keshavarz, Meiyappan Nagappan
2022· article· en· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
An empirical study on bug propagation through code cloning
Manishankar Mondal, Banani Roy, Chanchal K. Roy, Kevin A. Schneider
2019· article· en· Journal of Systems and Software· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
affunlabeled
Extracting Build Changes with BUILDDIFF
Christian Macho, Shane McIntosh, Martin Pinzger
2017· article· en· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
affunlabeled
A replication study
Steven R. Young, Tamer Abdou, Ayşe Bener
2018· article· en· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
afffundunlabeled
STRATOS
Bon Adriel Aseniero, Tiffany Wun, David Ledo, Guenther Ruhe, Anthony Tang, Sheelagh Carpendale
2015· article· en· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
21
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About