MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,683 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,683 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 24 of 54

Labels cover 0 of 2,683 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,683 of 2,683 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
Deep snow slab avalanches
David Tracz
2012· dissertation· en· PRISM (University of Calgary)· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affunlabeled
Risk assessments for debris flows
Matthias Jakob, Kris Holm
2012· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affunlabeled
Geohazard Risk Management for the Nor Andino Gas Pipeline
Michael J. Porter, Rodolfo Reale, Gabriel Marcuz, K. Wayne Savigny
2006· article· en· Volume 3: Materials and Joining; Pipeline Automation and Measurement; Risk and Reliability, Parts A and B· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affunlabeled
Prediction procedure for hail impact
Simon Dousset, Jérémie Girardot, Frédéric Dau, A. Gakwaya
2018· article· en· EPJ Web of Conferences· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
afffundvenueunlabeled
Movement behaviour of the Little Chief Slide
M. Mansour, C. Derek Martin, Norbert R. Morgenstern
2011· article· en· Canadian Geotechnical Journal· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Deceleration of projectiles in sand
Stephan Bless, William L. Cooper, Keiko Watanabe, Robert Peden
2012· article· en· AIP conference proceedings· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Bombings of dams : a historical review
Abass Braimah, Ettore Contestabile
2007· review· en· OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About