MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,745 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,745 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 32 of 35

Labels cover 4 of 1,745 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,745 of 1,745 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
The Advantage of International Courts
Shai Dothan
2018· article· he· Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
How Context Shapes the Authority of International Courts
Karen Jill Alter-Hanson, Laurence R. Helfer, Mikael Rask Madsen
2018· book-chapter· en· Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Fear and Loathing in <i>Jus Cogens</i>
E. Morgan
2008· article· en· International Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Historic Ruling
Jérôme de Hemptinne, RENFORCE / Regulering en handhaving, Rechten van de mens
2025· article· en· Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Nedeski, Nataša: Shared Obligations in International Law
Yoshifumi Tanaka
2022· article· de· Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht / Heidelberg Journal of International Law· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Thick Law, Thin Justice
Patrick Macklem
2017· article· en· Michigan Law Review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Does Law (D)evolve?
Clément Marquet
2025· article· fr· Revue québécoise de droit international· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About