MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

5,777 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
5,777 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 36 of 116

Labels cover 12 of 5,777 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 5,777 of 5,777 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Qu'est-ce qu'un TAT transmissible ?
Odile Husain, Frieda Rossel
2002· article· fr· Psychologie clinique et projective· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Présentation
Claude Corbo, Robert Gagnon
2004· article· fr· Bulletin d histoire politique· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Quand le temps change avec le temps
Étienne Brunet
2016· article· fr· HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
La question du prosélytisme lectoral
Marlène Lebrun
2008· article· fr· Repères· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Contents / SommaireVolume 29, 2002
2002· article· en· Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
1
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Douze versions de « l’entre-deux » de Claude Cahun / Claude Cahun. Contexte, posture, filiation : pour une esthétique de l’entre-deux. Sous la direction d’Andrea Oberhuber. Département des littératures de langue française de l’Université de Montréal, « Paragraphes », vol. 27, 257 p.
Pierre-David Gendron-Bouchard
2008· article· fr· Spirale : arts • Lettres • Sciences humaines· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affvenueno abstractunlabeled
Présentation
Clara Foz, Francisco Lafarga
2004· article· fr· TTR traduction terminologie rédaction· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
1
citations
affunlabeled
La phrase de Simon est-elle complexe ?
Marie-Albane Watine
2020· preprint· fr· HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Semiology and the Focus on Language
M. Danesi
2006· book-chapter· en· Elsevier eBooks· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About