MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Criminal Law and Evidence
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,849 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,849 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 4 of 37

Labels cover 2 of 1,849 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,849 of 1,849 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
The Historical Analysis of Criminal Codes
Markus D. Dubber
2000· article· en· Law and History Review· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
4
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Courted and Abandoned: Seduction in Canadian Law
Patrick Brode
2002· book· en· Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrowconsensus · none
4
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Alternative Models of Court Administration
Lorne Sossin, Carl Baar, Robert Hann
2006· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affunlabeled
Legitimating Penal Law
Markus D. Dubber
2007· article· en· TSpace· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
Du droit libéral au droit bureaucratique
Danielle Laberge, Pierre Landreville
2011· article· fr· Cahiers de recherche sociologique· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+sts+research_integrity+insufficient_payloadconsensus · research_integrity
4
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
The Historical Analysis of Criminal Codes
Markus D. Dubber
2000· article· en· Law and History Review· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
4
citations
afffundvenueaboutunlabeled
Remanding Justice for the Innocent
Cheryl Marie Webster
2022· article· en· The Wrongful Conviction Law Review· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · sts+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
4
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Judges, bias and recusal in Canada
Lorne Sossin
2011· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Reconceiving Solicitor-Client Privilege
Adam M. Dodek
2008· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
4
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About