MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
University of Toronto Law Journal
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

571 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
571 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 7 of 12

Labels cover 0 of 571 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 571 of 571 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affunlabeled
Autonomy
Gideon Parchomovsky, Alex Stein
2020· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
RETHINKING THE DICEYAN DIALECTIC
Matthew Lewans
2008· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Chronotopes of security legal regimes
Irit Ballas
2022· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
<scp>editors' note</scp>
Shai Lavi, Hamish Stewart
2011· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Contracting Without Promising
Crescente Molina
2025· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
The patriation of Canadian corporate law
Camden Hutchison
2019· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
What is purposive interpretation?
Jacob Weinrib
2022· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affvenueunlabeled
The question of fairness in contract law
John D. McCamus
2020· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
THE IDEA OF CONSIDERATION
Peter Benson
2011· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Unjust enrichment in law and equity
Jennifer Nadler
2024· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Investment Rules and the Denial of Change
Gus Van Harten
2010· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affvenueunlabeled
INVESTMENT RULES AND THE DENIAL OF CHANGE
Gus Van Harten
2010· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Future(s) of American Legal History
Ángela Fernández
2012· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Nazi Law and the Concept of Community
Richard Mullender
2008· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Formalism in Music and Law
Allan Beever
2011· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
Willis, 'Theology,' and the Rule of Law
Mary Liston
2005· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
INTRODUCTION
Markus D. Dubber
2013· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
1
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
<i>Dunsmuir</i>’s Disconnect
Matthew Lewans
2018· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About