MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,890 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,890 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 9 of 38

Labels cover 4 of 1,890 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,890 of 1,890 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Polls and the Vote in Britain
Christopher Wlezien, Will Jennings, Stephen D. Fisher, Robert Ford, Mark Pickup
2013· article· en· Political Studies· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
26
citations
affunlabeled
Contradictory Calculi
Shane Singh
2010· article· en· Political Research Quarterly· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
25
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The calculus of ethical voting
Timothy Feddersen, Alvaro Sandroni
2006· article· en· International Journal of Game Theory· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
24
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Constituency Campaigning in the Age of Data
Kaija Belfry Munroe, Henry Munroe
2017· article· en· Canadian Journal of Political Science· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
24
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Do Voters Vote Sincerely?
Arianna Degan, Antonio Merlo
2006· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
24
citations
affunlabeled
Presidential Responsiveness to Public Opinion
James Druckman, Lawrence R. Jacobs
2010· book-chapter· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
24
citations
affunlabeled
The Sources of Valence Judgments
Maria Zakharova, Paul Warwick
2014· article· en· Comparative Political Studies· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Accentuating the Negative?
Harold D. Clarke, Allan Kornberg, Thomas J. Scotto
2010· article· en· Methodology· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About