MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Literature, Musicology, and Cultural Analysis
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,320 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,320 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 9 of 27

Labels cover 5 of 1,320 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,320 of 1,320 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affvenueunlabeled
Afterword
Cynthia E. Milton
2019· article· fr· Les ateliers de l éthique· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Organistes versus ménétriers
J. F. Maxou Heintzen
2025· book-chapter· fr· Presses universitaires de Rennes eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Canadian Choral Music Partnerships
P. Morton Shand
2004· article· en· TSpace (University of Toronto)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
And Harmony Abound
Keith William Kinder
2022· book· en· McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Close encounters with the ‘Other’
Thibaut Schilt
2023· article· en· Journal of Romance Studies· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Trait d’union
Hélène Longval
2021· article· fr· Revue Possibles· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
(Pro)créer sur la scène contemporaine
Louise Frappier
2023· article· fr· Percées Explorations en arts vivants· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
<i>Centre Mnémo</i>
Pierre Chartrand
2025· article· fr· Rabaska Revue d ethnologie de l Amérique française· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
What’s Been Lost
Trevor Ross
2003· article· en· English studies in Canada· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About