MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Robotic Process Automation Applications
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

43 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20072025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
43 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 1

Labels cover 0 of 43 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 43 of 43 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundvenueunlabeled
Robotics in Nursing: Protocol for a Scoping Review
Elizabeth Mirekuwaa Darko, Manal Kleib, Gillian Lemermeyer, Mahdi Tavakoli
2023· review· en· JMIR Research Protocols· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affunlabeled
Robotic Process Automation in Laboratory Medicine
Khushbu Patel, Simone Arvisais‐Anhalt, Dustin R. Bunch, Daniel T. Holmes, Nicholas C. Spies
2025· article· en· Clinical Chemistry· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Xforce Keygen Vehicle Tracking 2019
2021· article· fa· Figshare· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
MashUp
Alex Wun
2018· book-chapter· en· Encyclopedia of Database Systems· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Bibliometric Analysis of Robotic Process Automation
Monika Sharma, Abhineet Saxena, Somya Choubey, Satish C. Sharma, Ravi Kumar Gupta
2022· article· en· International Journal of Robotics and Automation· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · bibliometricsconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Initial Preparation
Robert Fantina, Andriy Storozhuk, Kamal Goyal
2021· book-chapter· en· Apress eBooks· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Automation and Robotics
Oyinkansola Sodiya, Valerie O. Babatope
2025· book-chapter· Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Development Methodologies and Framework
Robert Fantina, Andriy Storozhuk, Kamal Goyal
2021· book-chapter· en· Apress eBooks· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Empowered Workflows: Automation for Everyone
Barbara Znamirowski
2018· article· en· Bulletin - Association of Canadian Map Libraries and Archives (ACMLA)· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About