MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

950 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
950 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 13 of 19

Labels cover 3 of 950 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 950 of 950 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Is pain representational?
Murat Aydede
2023· article· en· Belgrade Philosophical Annual· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
L’irrationnalité doxastique
Aude Bandini
2018· article· fr· Revue philosophique de la France et de l étranger· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Le côté « obscur » de la science
Giulia Anichini
2017· article· fr· Revue d anthropologie des connaissances· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
1
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
Reframing the Placebo Concept
M Dongier, Thomas G. Brown
2011· letter· en· The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Placebos
Anne Holbrook, Charles H. Goldsmith, Mova Leung
2008· other· en· Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
[no title]
Shawn D. Aaron, Robert Dales
2000· article· en· Annals of Emergency Medicine· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
In response to Drs. Momm and Lutterbach
Jolie Ringash, Brian O’Sullivan, John Waldron, Padraig Warde
2005· article· en· International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The Imaginary Pill Technique
Steve de Shazer
2024· article· en· Journal of Systemic Therapies· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Descartes : l'infinitude de ma volonté
Jean‐Baptiste Jeangène Vilmer
2008· article· fr· Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About