MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,130 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,130 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 14 of 43

Labels cover 1 of 2,130 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,130 of 2,130 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Judging the Rules of Belonging
Howard Kislowicz
2011· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
Mapping Judicial Independence
Micah B. Rankin
2013· article· en· Global Journal of Comparative Law· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
The Increasing Irrelevance of Section 1 of the Charter
Christopher D. Bredt, Adam M. Dodek
2001· article· en· The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · sts
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
THE EVERYDAY PROBLEM OF EMERGENCIES
N.C. Lazar
2009· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
2
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
New Models of Constitutional Review
Francesco Duranti
2014· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Human rights and the courts in Canada
Branko Constantinou
2016· article· en· Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
The Legal Power
Madeleine Cantin Cumyn
2009· article· en· European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrow+sts+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
2
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Canadian Judicial Council
Paul C. Weiler
2017· article· en· Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
2
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About