MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

367 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
367 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 8

Labels cover 0 of 367 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 367 of 367 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Classification-Driven Watershed Segmentation
Ilya Levner, Hong Zhang
2007· article· en· IEEE Transactions on Image Processing· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
126
citations
affunlabeled
Fractal image denoising
Mohsen Ghazel, G.H. Freeman, Edward R. Vrscay
2003· article· en· IEEE Transactions on Image Processing· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
117
citations
affunlabeled
Shape retrieval based on dynamic programming
Evangelos Milios, Euripides G. M. Petrakis
2000· article· en· IEEE Transactions on Image Processing· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
114
citations
affunlabeled
Co-Transduction for Shape Retrieval
Xiang Bai, Bo Wang, Cong Yao, Wenyu Liu, Zhuowen Tu
2011· article· en· IEEE Transactions on Image Processing· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
112
citations
affunlabeled
Real-Time Discriminative Background Subtraction
Li Cheng, Minglun Gong, Dale Schuurmans, Terry Caelli
2010· article· en· IEEE Transactions on Image Processing· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
104
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About