MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,100 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,100 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 21 of 42

Labels cover 193 of 2,100 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,100 of 2,100 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

fundno affunlabeled
Impact Beyond Citation: An Introduction to Altmetrics
Cameron Neylon, Michelle Willmers, Thomas King
2014· article· en· Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town)· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometricsconsensus · none
4
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
Predatory Journals and Junk Meetings
Togas Tulandi, Jacques Balayla
2019· editorial· en· Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
4
citations
affunlabeled
Science of science
Santo Fortunato, Carl T. Bergstrom, Katy Börner, James A. Evans, Dirk Helbing, S. Milojević +8 more
2021· article· en· Bibliosphere· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · bibliometricsconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
Estimating Open Access Mandate Effectiveness: The MELIBEA Score
Philippe Vincent‐Lamarre, Jade Boivin, Yassine Gargouri, Vincent Larivière, Stevan Harnad
2014· preprint· en· arXiv (Cornell University)· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometrics+open_scienceconsensus · none
3
citations
venueno affgemma · metaresearch+open_sciencegpt · metaresearch+scholarly_communication+open_sciencemodels split
Do Institutional Repository Deposit Guidelines Deter Data Discovery?
Shawn Nicholson, Terrence Bennett
2021· article· en· Evidence Based Library and Information Practice· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationconsensus · metaresearch
3
citations
venueno affunlabeled
From the Editor: Implications of the Impact Factor
Fern Swedlove
2005· editorial· en· Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometricsconsensus · none
3
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Increasing citations to your work
Roger Watson, Hugh McKenna, David R. Thompson
2019· editorial· en· Journal of Advanced Nursing· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometricsconsensus · none
3
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Acknowledgment Research Genealogy for Today’s Quantified Academia
Adèle Paul‐Hus, Nadine Desrochers, Jen Pecoskie, Vincent Larivière
2016· article· fr· Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometricsconsensus · none
3
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Incentivizing Peer Review
Ann Blair Kennedy
2017· editorial· en· International Journal of Therapeutic Massage & Bodywork Research Education & Practice· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
3
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Before and After: OA in Developing Countries
Barbara Kirsop
2007· article· en· Hispana· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communication+open_scienceconsensus · none
3
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Scholarly publishing threatened?
Arne Andersson
2016· article· en· Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
3
citations
venueno affgemma · metaresearch+bibliometricsgpt · metaresearch+bibliometrics+research_integritymodels split
Who is Publishing in Biomedical Predatory Journals? A Study on Chinese Scholars
Jiahao Wang, Cheng Yang, Ming Chen
2023· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometrics+research_integrityconsensus · none
3
citations
affaboutunlabeled
How faculty define quality, prestige, and impact in research
Esteban Morales, Erin C. McKiernan, Meredith T. Niles, Lesley A. Schimanski, Juan Pablo Alperín
2021· preprint· en· bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometricsconsensus · none
3
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About