MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,728 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,728 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 26 of 55

Labels cover 3 of 2,728 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,728 of 2,728 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

fundno affno abstractunlabeled
Phonetics of Endangered Languages
D. H. Whalen, Christian DiCanio, Patricia Shaw
2011· article· en· Acoustics Today· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
venueno affunlabeled
A Cognitive View on Prosodic Relations
Doina Jitcă
2024· article· en· English Linguistics Research· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Perception of Canadian French rhotic vowels
Jeffrey Lamontagne, Jeff Mielke
2013· article· en· The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
Introduction
Heather Goad, Yvan Rose
2003· article· fr· The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
2
citations
affunlabeled
An Exemplar Dynamic Approach to Language Shift
Sonya Bird
2008· article· en· The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
Variability in French word-final schwa
Angeliki Athanasopoulou, Irene Vogel
2020· book-chapter· en· Romance languages and linguistic theory· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
Voice and Voice Quality
John H. Esling, Scott R. Moisik, Allison Benner, Lise Crevier‐Buchman
2019· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
Morpho-phonological Acquisition
Anne‐Michelle Tessier
2016· book· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About