MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,470 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,470 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 26 of 30

Labels cover 5 of 1,470 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,470 of 1,470 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Moral Muteness
Frederick Bird
2015· other· en· Wiley Encyclopedia of Management· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Being Good
Grant Gillett, Walter Glannon
2023· book-chapter· en· New Directions in Philosophy and Cognitive Science· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Inability and Obligation in Moral Judgment
Wesley Buckwalter, John Turri
2015· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Criminology
Kristopher J. Brazil, Lisa Whittingham
2021· book-chapter· en· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
On the Nature of Moral Judgment
Nalini Ramlakhan
2014· article· en· eScholarship (California Digital Library)· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Association as a Conduit of Blame
Alexandra Culbert, Ella Hands, Anisha Imtiaz
2025· article· en· Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Studying the Functionality of Luck
Kaiwen Tee
2025· article· en· Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
fundaboutno affunlabeled
Do We Need Empathy for Moral Motivation
Benise S.K. Mak
2005· article· en· eScholarship (California Digital Library)· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Author response
Karl‐Jürgen Bär, Gerd Wagner
2015· letter· en· Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueunlabeled
dimensions de l'envie
Mélanie Foucault, Emmanuel Habimana, Marcos Alencar Abaíde Balbinotti, Daniela Wiethaeuper
2023· article· fr· Ad machina l avenir de l humain au travail· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About