MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,390 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,390 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 27 of 28

Labels cover 4 of 1,390 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,390 of 1,390 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundaboutunlabeled
Filtering the Headlines
Lindsay A. Vodarek
2021· preprint· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Russia’s STS Television Network
Jeffrey Brassard
2017· article· en· VIEW Journal of European Television History and Culture· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
John Logie-Baird: Television and Me
Adrian R. Hills
2005· article· en· Kinema A Journal for Film and Audiovisual Media· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
The Politics of Celebrity Elections - STATA code.txt
Christopher J. Anderson, Luc Arrondel, André Blais, Jean‐François Daoust, Jean‐François Laslier, Karine Van der Straeten
2019· dataset· en· Harvard Dataverse· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Unveiling NetzDG: The Digital Berlin Wall
Soorya Balendra
2024· book-chapter· en· Law, governance and technology series· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
The Yes Men
John Pace
2003· article· en· M/C Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Analyzing the Kystone XL debate
Barbora Chaloupková
2017· dissertation· cs· Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About