MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Design Education and Practice
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,078 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,078 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 3 of 22

Labels cover 1 of 1,078 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,078 of 1,078 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Relational Design
Victor Udoewa, Savannah Gress
2023· article· en· Journal of Awareness-Based Systems Change· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
25
citations
affunlabeled
Inspired and Inspiring Textile Designers
Megan Strickfaden, Lesley A. Stafiniak, Tomislav Terzin
2015· article· en· Clothing and Textiles Research Journal· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
affunlabeled
Design Flow and Ideation
Tomás Dorta
2008· article· en· International Journal of Architectural Computing· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
21
citations
afffundunlabeled
Including Functional Models of Biological Phenomena as Design Stimuli
Vanessa Vakili, I. Chiu, L. H. Shu, Daniel A. McAdams, Robert B. Stone
2007· article· en· Volume 3: 19th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology; 1st International Conference on Micro- and Nanosystems; and 9th International Conference on Advanced Vehicle Tire Technologies, Parts A and B· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
affunlabeled
Why Systematic Design Engineering?
W. Ernst Eder
2009· article· en· Volume 8: 14th Design for Manufacturing and the Life Cycle Conference; 6th Symposium on International Design and Design Education; 21st International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, Parts A and B· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
19
citations
afffundvenueunlabeled
ENCOURAGING EMPATHY IN ENGINEERING DESIGN
Holly R. Algra, Clifton R. Johnston
2015· article· en· Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
17
citations
afffundvenueunlabeled
A THEORETICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON DESIGN CREATIVITY
Yong Zeng, Baiquan Yan, Bo Chen, Shengji Yao
2011· article· en· Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About