MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

996 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
996 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 3 of 20

Labels cover 2 of 996 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 996 of 996 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Branching and merging
Shaun Phillips, Jonathan Sillito, Robert J. Walker
2011· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
42
citations
affgemma · no categorygpt · no categorymodels split
ThinkRepair: Self-Directed Automated Program Repair
Xin Yin, Chao Ni, Shaohua Wang, Zhenhao Li, Limin Zeng, Xiaohu Yang
2024· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
40
citations
afffundunlabeled
Automated Bug Finding in Video Games
Simon Varvaressos, Kim Lavoie, Sébastien Gaboury, Sylvain Hallé
2017· article· en· Computers in entertainment· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
40
citations
affunlabeled
Collaborative Runtime Verification with Tracematches
Eric Bodden, Laurie Hendren, Patrick Lam, Ondřej Lhoták, Nomair A. Naeem
2008· article· en· Journal of Logic and Computation· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
39
citations
affunlabeled
On reducing test length for FSMs with extra states
Adenilso Simão, Alexandre Petrenko, Nina Yevtushenko
2011· article· en· Software Testing Verification and Reliability· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
38
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Covering arrays avoiding forbidden edges
Peter Danziger, Eric Mendelsohn, Lucia Moura, Brett Stevens
2009· article· en· Theoretical Computer Science· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
38
citations
afffundunlabeled
State generation and automated class testing
Thomas Ball, Daniel Hoffman, Frank Ruskey, Richard L. Webber, Lee White
2000· article· en· Software Testing Verification and Reliability· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
36
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
A practical approach to testing GUI systems
Ping Li, Toan Huynh, Marek Reformat, James Miller
2006· article· en· Empirical Software Engineering· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
35
citations
affunlabeled
Whitening SOA Testing via Event Exposure
Chunyang Ye, Hans‐Arno Jacobsen
2013· article· en· IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
affunlabeled
C to Java migration experiences
J. Martin, Hausi Müller
2003· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Software Testing and Quality Assurance
Sagar Naik
2007· book· en· John Wiley & Sons eBooks· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
affunlabeled
Fine-grained test minimization
Arash Vahabzadeh, Andrea Stocco, Ali Mesbah
2018· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
31
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Example-based model-transformation testing
Marouane Kessentini, Houari Sahraoui, Mounir Boukadoum
2011· article· en· Automated Software Engineering· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
30
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
An EFSM-Based Passive Fault Detection Approach
Hasan Ural, Zhi Xu
2007· book-chapter· en· Lecture notes in computer science· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About