MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
American Constitutional Law and Politics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,460 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,460 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 37 of 70

Labels cover 6 of 3,460 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,460 of 3,460 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affvenueaboutunlabeled
Reflections on the Kitchen Accord
Roy Romanow
2012· article· en· Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Introduction
Paul J. Quirk
2019· book-chapter· en· The United States and Canada· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Theorizing the Americanist Tradition
Bruce G. Miller
2001· article· en· American Ethnologist· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Diplomats and the Civil War at Sea
Francis M. Carroll
2010· article· en· Canadian Review of American Studies· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Aversion and Desire
Melissa D’Agostino
2006· article· en· American Journal of Islam and Society· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Josué et la violence
Paul Béré
2023· article· fr· Théologiques· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
On Salvation
J. L. Schellenberg
2024· book-chapter· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
Mission Institution
Anonymous Prisoner
2017· article· en· Journal of Prisoners on Prisons· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Andrew Jackson and US Foreign Relations
Jason Opal
2018· reference-entry· en· Oxford Research Encyclopedia of American History· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
Legislators and Religious-Based Reasoning
Diana Ginn, David Blaikie, Micah Goldstein
2013· article· en· Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Antipopery and the End of the Protestant State
Katherine Carté
2021· book-chapter· en· University of North Carolina Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About