MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

605 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
605 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 4 of 13

Labels cover 0 of 605 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 605 of 605 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
A Human-Centric Off-Line Signature Verification System
H. Coetzer, Robert Sabourin
2007· article· en· Proceedings of the International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Table detection for visually rich document images
Bin Xiao, Murat Şimşek, Burak Kantarcı, Ala Abu Alkheir
2023· article· en· Knowledge-Based Systems· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
12
citations
affunlabeled
Automatic Pitch Detection In Printed Square Notation.
Gabriel Vigliensoni, John Burgoyne, Andrew Hankinson, Ichiro Fujinaga
2011· article· en· Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
What is the error margin of your signature analysis?
Raymond Marquis, Liv Cadola, Williams Mazzella, Tacha Hicks
2017· article· en· Forensic Science International· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About