MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,822 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,822 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 45 of 57

Labels cover 145 of 2,822 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,822 of 2,822 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
Research Integrity - where are we?
Octavian Andronic
2019· article· en· Journal of Surgical Sciences· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch
0
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Does a Journal Have an Ethical Monitoring Duty?
Antony Porcino
2016· article· en· International Journal of Therapeutic Massage & Bodywork Research Education & Practice· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · research_integrityconsensus · none
0
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Data Security in Electronic Health Records
Stefane Kabene, Raymond Leduc, Candace J. Gibson
2010· book-chapter· en· IGI Global eBooks· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Human Research Protection Programs
Melissa A. Epstein, Steven Lascher
2015· book-chapter· en· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · research_integrityconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Microtus miurus Osgood 1901
2017· article· en· Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Ethical Issues of Genetic Information Banks
Abdolhassan Kazemi, Feizollahi Nejat, Abbasi Mahmoud, Mehrzad Kiani
2010· article· en· Faṣlnāmah-i akhlāq-i pizishkī./Faṣlnāmah-i akhlāq-i pizishkī.· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenuegemma · research_integritygpt · no categorymodels split
Planning for Multi-Site Ethics Review
Carolyn S. Dewa, Jennifer Gold
2005· article· en· Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
EDITORIAL
2008· article· en· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About