MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

780 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
780 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 6 of 16

Labels cover 2 of 780 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 780 of 780 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueaboutno affunlabeled
Case Comment on R. v. Marshall
W. H. Hurlburt
2000· article· en· Alberta Law Review· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Re) Constructing Judicial Ethics in Canada
Richard Devlin
2010· article· en· Scholarly Commons (University of the Pacific)· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Alberta Law Reform Institute
Melanie Alexandre
2016· article· en· Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
ESTs under Canadian Patent Law: Useful or Not?
Natalie C. Bellefeuille
2006· article· en· eYLS (Yale Law School)· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
affunlabeled
Review of Sexual Science and the Law
Bernard M. Dickens
2008· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
How Just Is Our Justice System
Frank J. Scardilli
2013· article· en· ETC.: A Review of General Semantics· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
U.S. Drug Court: A Building Block For Canada
Lisa R. Strauss
2002· article· en· NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University)· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractgemma · no categorygpt · no categorymodels agree
British Columbia Courthouse Library Society.
Vassiliki Sahapattana
2017· article· en· Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · sts+scholarly_communication+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
10.1016/s0029-7437(05)70994-0
2000· article· en· Time to knit· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About