MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

757 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
757 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 6 of 16

Labels cover 1 of 757 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 757 of 757 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Cathodic Protection
Richard W. Evitts, Glyn Kennell
2018· book-chapter· en· Elsevier eBooks· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affunlabeled
Strength of Line Pipe With Dent and Crack Defect
Abu Rafi, Jorge Sá Silva, Sara Kenno, Sreekanta Das, Richard Kania, Rick Yahua Wang
2010· article· en· 2010 8th International Pipeline Conference, Volume 1· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affunlabeled
Reliability-Based Limit States Design for Onshore Pipelines
Maher Nessim, Tom Zimmerman, Alan Glover, Martin McLamb, Brian Rothwell, Joe Zhou
2002· article· en· 4th International Pipeline Conference, Parts A and B· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affunlabeled
Probabilistic Modeling of Corroded Pipeline Structures
D. P. Brennan, Unyime O. Akpan, I. R. Orisamolu, Ian Glover, Ibrahim Konuk
2002· article· en· 4th International Pipeline Conference, Parts A and B· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
afffundunlabeled
Dynamic risk management of assets susceptible to pitting corrosion
Elahe Shekari, Faisal Khan, Salim Ahmed
2019· article· en· Corrosion Engineering Science and Technology The International Journal of Corrosion Processes and Corrosion Control· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affunlabeled
How to Optimize the Design of Mechanical Crack Arrestors
Gery Wilkowski, D. Rudland, Brian Rothwell
2006· article· en· Volume 3: Materials and Joining; Pipeline Automation and Measurement; Risk and Reliability, Parts A and B· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Stealth on the Water
Michael Valenti
2001· article· en· Mechanical Engineering· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About