MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
BIM and Construction Integration
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,860 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,860 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 38

Labels cover 5 of 1,860 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,860 of 1,860 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affaboutunlabeled
Change Orders Impact on Labor Productivity
Osama Moselhi, Ihab Assem, Khaled El‐Rayes
2005· article· en· Journal of Construction Engineering and Management· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
145
citations
affunlabeled
Embedded contexts of innovation
Érik Poirier, Sheryl Staub‐French, Daniel Forgues
2015· article· en· Construction Innovation· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
121
citations
affunlabeled
Challenges for Integrated Design and Delivery Solutions
Robert Owen, Robert Amor, Mark E Palmer, John Dickinson, C. B. Tatum, Abdul Samad Kazi +3 more
2010· article· en· Architectural Engineering and Design Management· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
109
citations
affunlabeled
The Journal of Object Technology
Regina Hebig, Anthony Anjorin, Alfonso Pierantonio, Davide Di Ruscio, Jens Weber
2017· paratext· en· The Journal of Object Technology· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
99
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Optimized decision support for BIM maturity assessment
Zhen‐Song Chen, Meng-Die Zhou, Kwai‐Sang Chin, Amos Darko, Xian‐Jia Wang, Witold Pedrycz
2023· article· en· Automation in Construction· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
99
citations
affunlabeled
Construction 4.0: a survey of research trends
Nathalie Perrier, Aristide Bled, Mario Bourgault, Nolwenn Cousin, Christophe Danjou, Robert Pellerin +1 more
2020· article· en· Journal of Information Technology in Construction· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · bibliometricsconsensus · none
83
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About