MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

30 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20102025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
30 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 1

Labels cover 0 of 30 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 30 of 30 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Principal component analysis
Hervé Abdi, Lynne J. Williams
2010· review· en· Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10,417
citations
affunlabeled
Spatial modeling with R‐INLA: A review
Haakon Bakka, Håvard Rue, Geir‐Arne Fuglstad, Andrea Riebler, David Bolin, Janine Illian +3 more
2018· review· en· Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
410
citations
affunlabeled
Computations using analysis of covariance
Timothy J. Barrett
2011· review· en· Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
28
citations
afffundunlabeled
Computational methods for birth‐death processes
Forrest W. Crawford, Lam Si Tung Ho, Marc A. Suchard
2018· review· en· Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
27
citations
affunlabeled
Least angle regression for model selection
Hongyang Zhang, Ruben H. Zamar
2014· review· en· Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
afffundunlabeled
Robust dimension reduction
Shojaeddin Chenouri, Jiaxi Liang, Christopher G. Small
2014· review· en· Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
afffundunlabeled
Orthogonal Arrays: A Review
C. Devon Lin, John Stufken
2025· review· en· Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affunlabeled
Likelihood inference
Nancy Reid
2010· review· en· Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
afffundunlabeled
Nuclear Norm Regularization
Dengdeng Yu, Dehan Kong
2025· review· en· Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
Geometry in statistics
Paul Vos, Paul Marriott
2010· review· en· Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
The History of ViSta: The Visual Statistics System
Pedro Valero‐Mora, Rubén Daniel Ledesma, Michael Friendly
2012· review· en· Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
Statistics of shape
Christopher G. Small
2011· review· en· Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
afffundunlabeled
A convergence diagnostic for Bayesian clustering
Martin Lysy, Masoud Asgharian, Vahid Partovi Nia
2020· review· en· Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About