MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

5,777 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
5,777 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 20 of 116

Labels cover 12 of 5,777 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 5,777 of 5,777 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affunlabeled
Le Q" anaphorique en…autant du français
Anne Zribi-Hertz
2009· article· fr· Revue québécoise de linguistique· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Il était une fois… l’habitude
Nicolas Couégnas
2010· article· fr· Protée· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Éloge de la noirceur
Claude Zilberberg
2004· article· fr· Protée· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
L’insignifiant : de Barthes à Proust
Stéphane Chaudier
2009· article· fr· Études françaises· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
L’écriture comme outil thérapeutique
Erica Francese
2022· article· fr· Revue de psychothérapie psychanalytique de groupe· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
"Maudit Bic" ou la maldiction
Mireille Ribière
2005· article· fr· Études littéraires· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
Cartographie linguistique des références citées
Vincent Larivière
2015· article· fr· Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · bibliometricsconsensus · none
2
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Tarski et la suppositio materialis
Claude Panaccio
2005· article· fr· Philosophiques· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Présentation
Hannelore Lee-Jahnke
2001· article· fr· Meta Journal des traducteurs· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Médium ou média ? Film ou cinéma ?
Laurent Jullier
2020· article· fr· Cinémas Revue d études cinématographiques· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About