MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,728 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,728 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 39 of 55

Labels cover 3 of 2,728 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,728 of 2,728 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Palatalization
Alexei Kochetov
2024· book-chapter· en· Elsevier eBooks· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Massive Auditory Lexical Decision
Benjamin V. Tucker, Matthew C. Kelley, Yoichi Mukai, Filip Nenadić, Scott James Perry
2024· book-chapter· en· Elsevier eBooks· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
The Syllable And Language Perception
2022· article· en· Canadian acoustics· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Vowel Harmony in Romance Languages
Stefano Canalis, Jesús Jiménez, Maria‐Rosa Lloret, Margaret E. L. Renwick
2024· book-chapter· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Phonological Phrase
Emily Elfner
2025· book-chapter· en· Elsevier eBooks· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Prosodic rhythm in Toronto Haitian English
Véronique Lacoste, Jeff Tennant
2017· preprint· en· HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Applied Phonetics and Phonology
Murray J. Munro
2025· book-chapter· en· Elsevier eBooks· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Problems in Québécois morphophonology
2018· article· en· Indiana Magazine of History (Indiana University)· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
The DP layer in heritage Norwegian
Terje Lohndal, Yvonne van Baal
2025· book-chapter· en· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About