MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Dutch Social and Cultural Studies
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

208 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
208 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 4 of 5

Labels cover 1 of 208 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 208 of 208 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
E-democratie in België en Canada
Ruud Wouters, Dietlind Stolle
2010· article· nl· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
fundno affno abstractunlabeled
"Stakeholder Involvement" in de KCE werkprocessen
Julien Piérart, Christian Léonard, Patrice Chalon, François Daue, Raf Mertens
2012· book· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
De waarde van statistisch onderzoek
Cas Wouters
2012· article· nl· Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Boetehoogten in het recht
Marjolijn Heerts
2013· dissertation· en· Molecular Metabolism· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Toezicht op zedendelinquenten
R.P. van der Horst, H.J.M. Schönberger, C.H. de Kogel
2012· article· nl· Den Haag· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Schaalgrootte vraagstukken rond werk en bijstand: Een overzicht
Arjen Edzes, Jan Dirk Gardenier, Paul Vrieze, Tjeuke Horsten
2006· article· nl· University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Reflectie op sociale actie in Canada
Wim Westerman
2002· article· nl· University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Over geluk, werk en vakantie
Kees Pijnappels
2018· article· nl· Advocatenblad· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About