MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

495 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
495 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 9 of 10

Labels cover 0 of 495 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 495 of 495 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
Quasi-Democracy?
David Stewart, Keith Archer
2001· book· nl· University of British Columbia Press eBooks· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrow+sts+insufficient_payloadconsensus · sts
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Variables, Data and Methods
Daniel Stockemer, Kofi Arhin
2023· book-chapter· en· SpringerBriefs in political science· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrow+stsconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The Limits of Populism as Causal Explanation
Teresa Kramarz, Donald Kingsbury
2021· book-chapter· en· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Conclusion
Alexander Moens, Alexandra Richards
2025· book-chapter· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrowconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Populisme de gauche et démocratie
Albert Ogien
2023· article· fr· Nouvelles perspectives en sciences sociales· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrow+sts+insufficient_payloadconsensus · sts+insufficient_payload
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Political Developments and Data in 2024
Raúl Gómez, Thomas Mustillo, Michelangelo Vercesi
2025· article· en· European Journal of Political Research Political Data Yearbook· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
V. Theorie – AGIL-Schema nach Talcott Parsons
Melissa Goossens
2020· book-chapter· de· Tectum – ein Verlag in der Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft eBooks· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrow+sts+research_integrity+insufficient_payloadconsensus · metaepi_narrow+research_integrity+insufficient_payload
0
citations
affunlabeled
Editorial: The Intersectionality of Hate
Sara Matthews, Nathan Rambukkana
2018· editorial· en· Atlantis Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+sts+research_integrityconsensus · sts
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
The Voting Audience
Kimberley A. Mullins
2008· article· en· M/C Journal· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Political Affect
Janet M. Phillips
2011· article· en· Symposium· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Fabricating Suspicious Religious Others
Michael Nijhawan
2016· book-chapter· en· Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrow+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
An Economic Recipe for Backlash
Krzysztof Pelc
2019· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About