MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

431 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
431 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 9

Labels cover 1 of 431 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 431 of 431 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
On-line outlier detection and data cleaning
Hancong Liu, Sirish L. Shah, Wei Jiang
2004· article· en· Computers & Chemical Engineering· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
431
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
A Bibliography of Process Capability Papers
Fred Spiring, Bartholomew P.K. Leung, Smiley W. Cheng, Anthony Yeung
2003· article· en· Quality and Reliability Engineering International· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · bibliometricsconsensus · none
153
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
A new nonparametric EWMA Sign Control Chart
Su‐Fen Yang, Jheng-Sian Lin, Smiley W. Cheng
2010· article· en· Expert Systems with Applications· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
136
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Set estimation and nonparametric detection
Amparo Ba ÍLLO, Antonio Cuevas, Ana Justel
2000· article· en· Canadian Journal of Statistics· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
79
citations
afffundunlabeled
Monitoring Processes with Highly Censored Data
Stefan H. Steiner, Robert J. MacKay
2000· article· en· Journal of Quality Technology· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
77
citations
affunlabeled
A new non‐parametric CUSUM mean chart
Su‐Fen Yang, Smiley W. Cheng
2010· article· en· Quality and Reliability Engineering International· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
74
citations
affunlabeled
A CCC‐<i>r</i> chart for high‐yield processes
Hiroshi Ohta, Etsuko Kusukawa, Abdur Rahim
2001· article· en· Quality and Reliability Engineering International· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
60
citations
50
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About