MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,449 results · 1 filter active ·
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,449 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 29

Labels cover 12 of 1,449 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,449 of 1,449 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Machine behaviour
2019· review· en· Nature· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · research_integrityconsensus · research_integrity
1,165
citations
affunlabeled
Learning Fair Representations
2013· article· en· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
1,001
citations
affunlabeled
Actionable Auditing
2019· article· en· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
586
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Governing AI safety through independent audits
2021· article· en· Nature Machine Intelligence· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · research_integrity+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
221
citations
affunlabeled
The Variational Fair Autoencoder
2015· preprint· en· UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam)· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
187
citations
venueno affunlabeled
When Is a Robot a Moral Agent?
2006· article· en· The International Review of Information Ethics· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
186
citations
venueno affunlabeled
What Should We Want From a Robot Ethic?
2006· article· en· The International Review of Information Ethics· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
160
citations
affunlabeled
AI Technologies, Privacy, and Security
2022· article· en· Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
158
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Interventional Fairness
2019· article· en· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
144
citations
affunlabeled
Fairness in Information Access Systems
2022· article· en· Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
118
citations
afffundunlabeled
Studying Up Machine Learning Data
2022· article· en· Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
113
citations
next →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About