MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Research in Social Sciences
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

552 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
552 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 12

Labels cover 2 of 552 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 552 of 552 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
PISA
2009· paratext· it· Programme for international student assessment/Internationale Schulleistungsstudie· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
437
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
PATHWAYS TO UNDERSTANDING: "WÂHKÔHTOWIN" AS A RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Kathleen O'Reilly-Scanlon, Christine Crowe, Angelina Weenie
2004· article· en· McGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l éducation de McGill· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
16
citations
affunlabeled
Inclusion for all; all for inclusion
Roger Mantie
2022· article· en· International Journal of Community Music· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
14
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Responsible fatherhood : a narrative approach
Petteri Eerola
2015· article· en· Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Kulttuurien tutkimuksen menetelmät
Konsta Kajander, Tiina-Riitta Lappi
2022· book· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Young Ireland
Christopher Morash
2023· book· en· New York University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
venueaboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Reimagining Child Welfare Systems in Canada
Janet Mosher, Jeffery Hewitt
2018· article· en· Journal of Law and Social Policy· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Barnevern og ettervern
Lars Bjarne Kristofersen
2009· article· no· NOVA-rapport· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
4
citations
affaboutgemma · no categorygpt · no categorymodels split
Writing Competitions as a New Research Method
Raija Warkentin
2002· article· en· International Journal of Qualitative Methods· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
4
citations
next →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About