MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

78 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
78 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 2

Labels cover 0 of 78 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 78 of 78 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Trade-off Analysis for Requirements Selection
Günther Ruhe, Armin Eberlein, Dietmar Pfahl
2003· article· en· International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
114
citations
affunlabeled
VISUALIZING THE EVOLUTION OF SOFTWARE USING SOFTCHANGE
Daniel M. Germán, Abram Hindle
2006· article· en· International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
46
citations
afffundunlabeled
FROM KNOWLEDGE MODELING TO ONTOLOGY CONSTRUCTION
Christine W. Chan
2004· article· en· International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
24
citations
affunlabeled
COMPARISON OF OPEN SOURCE TOOLS FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT
André Marques Pereira, Rafael Queiroz Gonçalves, Christiane Gresse von Wangenheim, Luigi Buglione
2013· article· en· International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
23
citations
affunlabeled
FORMALIZATION OF TEXTUAL USE CASES BASED ON PETRI NETS
Stéphane S. Somé
2010· article· en· International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
19
citations
affunlabeled
AUTOMATED STAGED CONFIGURATION WITH SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGIES
Marko Bošković, Ebrahim Bagheri, Dragan Gašević, Bardia Mohabbati, Nima Kaviani, Marek Hatala
2010· article· en· International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
19
citations
afffundunlabeled
SOFTWARE RESOURCE ARCHITECTURE
C.M. Woodside
2001· article· en· International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
18
citations
affunlabeled
TEMPORAL SOFTWARE CHANGE PREDICTION USING NEURAL NETWORKS
Mehdi Amoui, Mazeiar Salehie, Ladan Tahvildari
2009· article· en· International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
affunlabeled
A TOOL BASED ON DL FOR UML MODEL CONSISTENCY CHECKING
Jocelyn Simmonds, María Cecilia Bastarrica, Nancy Hitschfeld, Sebastián Rivas
2008· article· en· International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
affunlabeled
ASSOCIATION ANALYSIS OF SOFTWARE MEASURES
Witold Pedrycz, Giancarlo Succi, Mae-Hee Chun
2002· article· en· International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
12
citations
affunlabeled
USE CASE PATTERNS
Liwu Li
2002· article· en· International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
afffundunlabeled
ISSUES AND MODELS IN SOFTWARE PRODUCT LINES
Jorge L. Díaz‐Herrera, Peter Knauber, Giancarlo Succi
2000· article· en· International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affunlabeled
ENHANCING OWL ONTOLOGIES WITH RELATION SEMANTICS
Cartik R. Kothari, David J. Russomanno
2008· article· en· International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
GUEST EDITORS' INTRODUCTION
Guohe Huang, Chew Wye Chan, Xiaodong Zhang
2008· article· en· International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
6
citations
afffundunlabeled
XML SCHEMA MATCHING
Jianguo Lü, Wang Ju, Shengrui Wang
2007· article· en· International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affunlabeled
A BUSINESS PROCESS CENTERED SOFTWARE ANALYSIS METHOD
JINGZHOU LI, Brien Maguire, Yiyu Yao
2003· article· en· International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
afffundunlabeled
ASSESSING TEST SUITES FOR BUFFER OVERFLOW VULNERABILITIES
Hossain Shahriar, Mohammad Zulkernine
2010· article· en· International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About