afffundaboutCONSORT 2010 Statement2010· article· en· Obstetrics and Gynecology· Decision Sciences527citations
affDEA models for two‐stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition2008· article· en· Naval Research Logistics (NRL)· Decision Sciences526citations
affaboutPolicy analytical capacity and evidence‐based policy‐making: Lessons from Canada2009· article· en· Canadian Public Administration· Decision Sciences524citations
affMeta‐analysis of prevalence: <scp><i>I</i><sup>2</sup></scp> statistic and how to deal with heterogeneity2022· article· en· Research Synthesis Methods· Decision Sciences524citations
afffundJudging the quality of evidence in reviews of prognostic factor research: adapting the GRADE framework2013· article· en· Systematic Reviews· Decision Sciences523citations
affIt's worse than you thought: The feedback negativity and violations of reward prediction in gambling tasks2007· article· en· Psychophysiology· Decision Sciences523citations
affsans résuméAn international registry of systematic-review protocols2010· article· en· The Lancet· Decision Sciences521citations
affMany faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research2002· review· en· Current Opinion in Rheumatology· Decision Sciences520citations
affShould Meta-Analyses of Interventions Include Observational Studies in Addition to Randomized Controlled Trials? A Critical Examination of Underlying Principles2007· article· en· American Journal of Epidemiology· Decision Sciences518citations
affComplexity and Adaptivity in Supply Networks: Building Supply Network Theory Using a Complex Adaptive Systems Perspective*2007· article· en· Decision Sciences· Decision Sciences517citations
affMeasuring Mobile Phone Use: Self-Report Versus Log Data2013· article· en· Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication· Decision Sciences515citations
affA decade of data linkage in Western Australia: strategic design, applications and benefits of the WA data linkage system2008· article· en· Australian Health Review· Decision Sciences514citations
affWork Motivation: History, Theory, Research, and Practice2012· book· en· Decision Sciences514citations
affWhy Break the Habit of a Lifetime? Rethinking the Roles of Intention, Habit, and Emotion in Continuing Information Technology use12009· article· en· MIS Quarterly· Decision Sciences511citations
affThe quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed2010· article· en· BMJ· Decision Sciences510citations
affPlanning experiments: Updated guidance on experimental design and analysis and their reporting III2022· editorial· en· British Journal of Pharmacology· Decision Sciences510citations
affRegret Minimization in Games with Incomplete Information2007· article· en· Decision Sciences510citations
affRegistration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting2018· review· en· Systematic Reviews· Decision Sciences506citations
affsans résuméBenchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases2006· article· en· Scientometrics· Decision Sciences506citations
affUpdating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement2020· preprint· en· Decision Sciences501citations
affsans résuméIntroduction to health measurement scales2010· review· en· Journal of Psychosomatic Research· Decision Sciences499citations
aboutno affFine‐resolution climate projections enhance regional climate change impact studies2007· article· en· Eos· Decision Sciences494citations
affThe Effect of Novel Attributes on Product Evaluation2001· article· en· Journal of Consumer Research· Decision Sciences493citations
affFactor Analytic Models: Viewing the Structure of an Assessment Instrument From Three Perspectives2005· review· en· Journal of Personality Assessment· Decision Sciences492citations
afffundsans résuméJustify your alpha2018· article· en· Nature Human Behaviour· Decision Sciences492citations