MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Crystal Structures and Properties
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

747 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
747 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 10 of 15

Labels cover 0 of 747 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 747 of 747 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
High-temperature Fe oxidation coupled with redistribution of framework cations in lobanovite, K<sub>2</sub>Na(Fe<sup>2+</sup><sub>4</sub>Mg<sub>2</sub>Na)Ti<sub>2</sub>(Si<sub>4</sub>O<sub>12</sub>)<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>(OH)<sub>4</sub>– the first titanosilicate case
Elena S. Zhitova, Andrey A. Zolotarev, F. C. Hawthorne, Sergey V. Krivovichev, Viktor N. Yakovenchuk, Alexey Goncharov
2019· article· en· Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science Crystal Engineering and Materials· Materials Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affunlabeled
Self-Assembly of Microporous Thiogermanate Frameworks
Mark J. MacLachlan, Robert W. J. Scott, Geoffrey A. Ozin, Douglas F. McIntosh
2000· article· en· Journal of Chemical Education· Materials Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Fulbrightite, the Arsenate Analog of Sincosite
Anthony R. Kampf, Mark A. Cooper, Barbara P. Nash, Joe Marty, P. M. Adams, Jakub Plášil +1 more
2020· article· en· The Canadian Mineralogist· Materials Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affvenueunlabeled
THE CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF KAMPFITE
L. C. Basciano, Lee A. Groat
2007· article· en· The Canadian Mineralogist· Materials Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
venueno affunlabeled
THE CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF SYNTHETIC KUTINAITE, Cu14Ag6As7
Ljiljana Karanović, Dejan Poleti, Emil Makovicky, T. Balić-Žunić, M. Makovicky
2002· article· en· The Canadian Mineralogist· Materials Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affvenueunlabeled
THE SINGLE-CRYSTAL X-RAY STRUCTURE OF GAGARINITE-(Ce)
M. J. Sciberras, Peter Leverett, Peter A. Williams, David E. Hibbs, A. C. Roberts, Joel D. Grice
2011· article· en· The Canadian Mineralogist· Materials Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About