MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

941 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
941 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 11 of 19

Labels cover 0 of 941 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 941 of 941 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
Comparative Succession Law
2025· book· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Canada
Geneviève Saumier
2021· book-chapter· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
The Frank G. Law Award
Gerald E. Lake
2000· article· en· Naval Engineers Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Note of appreciation
2023· article· en· Canadian Journal of Animal Science· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Note of appreciation
2023· article· en· Canadian Journal of Microbiology· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
LA LOI 89 ET LE DROIT INTERNATIONAL PRIVÉ
Éthel Groffier
2019· article· fr· Revue générale de droit· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Scope of (Remedial) Jurisdiction
Dan Jerker B. Svantesson
2017· book· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Reviewer acknowledgement 2013
Hadi Seikaly, Erin D. Wright
2014· article· en· Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Index of Cases / Index de la jurisprudence
2014· article· fr· Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Liverpool 1974
2025· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
Canadian Cases in Private International Law in 2022
Ashley Barnes
2023· article· en· Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE PERSONS CASE
Anne McLellan
2011· article· en· Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Introduction
Maxime Cartron
2023· article· fr· Littératures classiques· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Conclusion. A Land Claim Is Canada’S Claim
Shiri Pasternak
2010· book-chapter· University of Minnesota Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
Canadian Cases in Private International Law in 2023
Ashley Barnes
2024· article· en· Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Campbellrand-Malmani Platform, South Africa
Daniele L. Pinti
2014· book-chapter· en· Encyclopedia of Astrobiology· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
Canadian Cases in Private International Law in 2024
Ashley Barnes
2025· article· en· Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Note of appreciation
2025· article· en· Canadian Journal of Physics· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About