MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
ASEG Extended Abstracts
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

273 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20012019
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
273 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 6

Labels cover 1 of 273 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 273 of 273 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
VK 1 - A new generation airborne gravity gradiometer
J. Anstie, T. Aravanis, M. Haederle, A. Mann, Shawn McIntosh, R. Smith +3 more
2009· article· en· ASEG Extended Abstracts· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affunlabeled
Novel ways to process and model GEOTEM data
Daniel Sattel, Richard Lane, Glenn Pears, Julian Vrbancich
2004· article· en· ASEG Extended Abstracts· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affunlabeled
Uncertainty in surface microseismic monitoring
Michael Thornton, Leo Eisner, Mike Mueller
2013· article· en· ASEG Extended Abstracts· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affunlabeled
Yamarna Geology: Foundations for Further Discovery
Janet Tunjic, John C. Donaldson, Justin Osborne, Clayton Davy’s, R. -A. Berg
2019· article· en· ASEG Extended Abstracts· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affunlabeled
The coming of age of gravity gradiometry
Dan DiFrancesco
2013· article· en· ASEG Extended Abstracts· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affunlabeled
Deep neural networks for 1D impedance inversion
Vladimir Puzyrev, Anton Egorov, A. Pirogova, Chris Elders, Claus Otto
2019· article· en· ASEG Extended Abstracts· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
Multidimensional Topology Transforms
Mark Jessell, Vitaliy Ogarko, Mark Lindsay, Evren Pakyuz-Charrier, Stéphane Perrouty
2018· article· en· ASEG Extended Abstracts· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
Airborne - EM Hydrocarbon mapping in Mozambique
Andreas Pfaffling, Ståle Monstad, R. W. Groom, Jonathan Rudd
2009· article· pt· ASEG Extended Abstracts· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About