MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,130 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,130 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 36 of 43

Labels cover 1 of 2,130 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,130 of 2,130 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
The nomination of Justice Kagan to the US Supreme
Federico Fabbrini
2010· article· it· Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
The Return of Legal Realism
Dan Priel
2018· book-chapter· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
The Last Quarter Century of Empirical Evidence
Erica Bosio
2024· article· en· The World Bank Open Knowledge Repository (World Bank)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Teaching the Rule of Law
Robert A. Stein
2009· article· en· Minnesota journal of international law· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
President’s Column
2011· article· Lincoln (University of Nebraska)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
President’s Column
2011· article· en· Lincoln (University of Nebraska)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Interpreting Dicey
Matthew Lewans
2023· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Developing Judicial Independence
Brad Epperly
2024· book-chapter· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The judicial review of legality
Natalie R. Davidson, Leora Bilsky
2021· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About