MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Smart Cities and Technologies
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

663 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
663 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 5 of 14

Labels cover 0 of 663 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 663 of 663 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
Can a Smart City Exist as Commons?
Anna Artyushina
2023· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Open Smart Cities Guide
Tracey P. Lauriault, Jean-Noé Landry, Rachel Bloom
2019· preprint· en· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
5
citations
afffundunlabeled
<i>Secret Lives of Data Publics</i>
Gabriel Resch, Beth Coleman, Matt Ratto, Bart Simon
2018· article· en· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Artificial intelligence, geography and society
Sophia Maalsen, Jonathan Cinnamon, Samuel Kinsley
2023· article· en· Digital Geography and Society· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affunlabeled
AI-Powered Sustainability in Smart Cities
Giovana Castanho, Hamed Taherdoost, Mitra Madanchian
2025· article· en· Procedia Computer Science· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Open Smart Cities Guide V.1.0
Tracey P. Lauriault, Rachel Bloom, Jean-Noé Landry
2019· article· en· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
fundno affunlabeled
HandYwiN
Arbi Chouikh
2018· article· en· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
Smart Mobility and Cities: A Study From Toronto-On
Guilherme Bridi, Emanuelle Soares dos Santos, Elenara Viera de Viera
2020· article· en· International Journal of Business Administration· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
SmartCities'15
Morito Matsuoka, Naonori Ueda, Hideyuki Tokuda, Rodger Lea, Luı́s Muñoz
2015· article· en· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
3
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Compara
Marcus Gordon, Sara Diamond, Minsheng Zheng, Michael J. Carnevale
2018· article· en· Encounters in Theory and History of Education· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About