MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

6,036 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
6,036 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 65 of 121

Labels cover 22 of 6,036 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 6,036 of 6,036 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affgemma · scholarly_communication+open_sciencegpt · scholarly_communication+open_sciencemodels split
Sur la voie de l’open access et de l’open data
Adeline Rege
2015· article· fr· I2D - Information données & documents· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · open_scienceconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Enquêter pour exposer
Lucie Alexis, Claire Blandin
2023· article· fr· Communication· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Du bon usage des Lumières : le livre numérique libre
Alain Jacquesson
2017· article· fr· Revue électronique suisse de science de l information (RESSI)· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communication+open_scienceconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Donnée administrative, ouvre-toi !
2025· article· fr· Communication· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · open_scienceconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
L’esprit publicitaire
Roland Canu, Bastien Soutjis
2018· article· fr· Communication· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Animisme de l’image
Karl Sierek
2014· article· fr· Intermédialités Histoire et théorie des arts des lettres et des techniques· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Le rôle du spectateur
Sydney Erdelyi
2018· article· fr· Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
OpenJ – The News Application
Sharda Chhabria, Chetan Dekate, Devarsh Thakre, Gaurav Waghaye, Silver Bondade, Suyash Narwade
2022· article· en· International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About