MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Journal of Water Management Modeling
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

457 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
457 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 7 of 10

Labels cover 0 of 457 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 457 of 457 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affunlabeled
Full Scale Up-Flo Filter Field Verification Tests
Yezhao Cai, Robert E. Pitt, Noboru Togawa, Kevin McGee, Kwabena Osei, Bob Andoh
2014· article· en· Journal of Water Management Modeling· Engineering
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
afffundvenueaboutunlabeled
Identifying Potential Pipe Failures: Toronto Case Study
Corinne J. Schuster‐Wallace, Edward A. McBean, Khizar Hayat
2007· article· en· Journal of Water Management Modeling· Engineering
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Study of Flow Around Developed Permeable Pile Groyne
Andi Patiroi, Adi Hendra, Tia Hetwisari, Sekaring Bumi Ingerawi
2025· article· en· Journal of Water Management Modeling· Environmental Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
An ArcView GIS tool for SWMM
2001· article· en· Journal of Water Management Modeling· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Micromonitoring
John Barton, Joseph Kamalesh, Roger Jacobsen
2013· article· en· Journal of Water Management Modeling· Environmental Science
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Communicating Flooding Issues to the Public at Large
Andrew McDonald, Andrew A. Mather, Wiero Vogelzang
2004· article· en· Journal of Water Management Modeling· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Stormwater Two-Ramp Drop Structures
Subhash C. Jain
2000· article· en· Journal of Water Management Modeling· Engineering
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Modeling of Hydrodynamic Regimes for the Thuan An Estuary
Nguyen Thanh Hung, Vu Dinh Cuong, Nguyễn Tiến Thành, Nguyen Van Hung, Trieu Quang Quan
2024· article· en· Journal of Water Management Modeling· Earth and Planetary Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About