MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Political Systems and Governance
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,755 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,755 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 9 of 56

Labels cover 3 of 2,755 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,755 of 2,755 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
Rights versus Devolution
Chris Himsworth
2001· book-chapter· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affunlabeled
The United Kingdom
Keith Syrett
2015· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
6
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Federalism, Nationalism and Regionalism in Canada
Richard Simeon, Luc Turgeon
2006· article· pt· RACO (Revistes Catalanes amb Accés Obert) (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Federalism: A Very Short Introduction
Mark J. Rozell, Clyde Wilcox
2019· book· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Romania: Political development and data for 2017
Lavinia Stan, Răzvan Zaharia
2018· article· en· European Journal of Political Research Political Data Yearbook· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Governing Canada
Michael Wernick
2021· book· en· University of British Columbia Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Political Parties and the Electoral System
Richard Johnston
2010· book-chapter· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affunlabeled
DEMOCRACY AND MULTICULTURALISM
Raphael Cohen‐Almagor, Will Kymlicka
2000· article· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affunlabeled
Assessing the Quality of Democracy
Arjun Tremblay
2007· article· en· Canadian Journal of Political Science· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
In Defence of Political Staff
Ian Brodie
2012· article· en· oURspace (University of Regina)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About