MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

806 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
806 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 17

Labels cover 0 of 806 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 806 of 806 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Rereading The Intellectuals on the Road to Class Power
Katherine Verdery, Michaël Bernhard, Jeffrey Kopstein, Gale Stokes, Michael D. Kennedy
2005· article· en· Theory and Society· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The Holodomor of 1932–33: How and Why?
S. Kulchytskyi
2015· article· en· East/West Journal of Ukrainian Studies· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Toronto International Film Festival
Virginia Wright Wexman
2006· article· en· Framework The Journal of Cinema and Media· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affunlabeled
The Making of Independent Ukraine
Serhy Yekelchyk
2023· article· en· LSE Public Policy Review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Reflections on Stalin and the Holodomor
Françoise Thom
2015· article· en· East/West Journal of Ukrainian Studies· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
The Russian provinces as a cultural myth
Lyudmila Parts
2016· article· en· Studies in Russian and Soviet Cinema· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Russia's 1905 Era Pogroms Reexamined
Gerald D. Surh
2010· article· en· Canadian-American Slavic Studies· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Imre Kertész and Holocaust Literature
Louise O. Vasvári, Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek
2005· book· en· Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About