MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,193 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,193 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 24

Labels cover 6 of 1,193 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,193 of 1,193 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Outliers detection and treatment: a review.
Denis Cousineau, Sylvain Chartier
2010· article· en· International journal of psychological research· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
679
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Functional Boxplots
Ying Sun, Marc G. Genton
2011· article· en· Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
417
citations
afffundunlabeled
Adaptive Huber Regression
Qiang Sun, Wen‐Xin Zhou, Jianqing Fan
2018· article· en· Journal of the American Statistical Association· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
305
citations
affunlabeled
The analysis of repeated measures designs: A review
H. J. Keselman, James Algina, Rhonda K. Kowalchuk
2001· review· en· British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
299
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The mean and median absolute deviations
T. Pham‐Gia, Trần Lộc Hùng
2001· article· en· Mathematical and Computer Modelling· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
287
citations
fundno affno abstractunlabeled
Permutation Methods
Paul W. Mielke, Kenneth J. Berry
2007· book· en· Springer series in statistics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
185
citations
afffundunlabeled
Bootrapping robust estimates of regression
Matías Salibián‐Barrera, Ruben H. Zamar
2002· article· en· The Annals of Statistics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
177
citations
affunlabeled
Detecting Dependence With Kendall Plots
Christian Genest, Jean-Claude Boies
2003· article· en· The American Statistician· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
160
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
Robust small area estimation
Sanjoy K. Sinha, J. N. K. Rao
2009· article· en· Canadian Journal of Statistics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
128
citations
affunlabeled
The New and Improved Two-Sample <i>t</i> Test
H. J. Keselman, Abdul Rahim Othman, Rand R. Wilcox, Katherine Fradette
2004· article· en· Psychological Science· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
122
citations
affvenueunlabeled
The weighted likelihood
Feifang Hu, James V. Zidek
2002· article· en· Canadian Journal of Statistics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
117
citations
afffundunlabeled
On depth and deep points: a calculus
Ivan Mizera
2002· article· en· The Annals of Statistics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
113
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About