MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

40 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20082025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
40 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 1

Labels cover 0 of 40 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 40 of 40 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
MiCOMP
Amir H. Ashouri, Andrea Bignoli, Gianluca Palermo, Cristina Silvano, Sameer G. Kulkarni, John Cavazos
2017· article· en· ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
95
citations
afffundunlabeled
Dynamic warp formation
Wilson Wai Lun Fung, Ivan Sham, George L. Yuan, Tor M. Aamodt
2009· article· en· ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
70
citations
affunlabeled
WADE
Zhe Wang, Shuchang Shan, Ting Cao, Junli Gu, Yi Xu, Shuai Mu +2 more
2013· article· en· ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
48
citations
fundno affunlabeled
MAGIC
Naghmeh Karimi, Arun K. Kanuparthi, Xueyang Wang, Ozgur Sinanoglu, Ramesh Karri
2015· article· en· ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
43
citations
affunlabeled
F <scp>ault</scp> S <scp>im</scp>
Prashant J. Nair, David Roberts, Moinuddin K. Qureshi
2015· article· en· ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
25
citations
affunlabeled
Reuse Distance-Based Probabilistic Cache Replacement
Subhasis Das, Tor M. Aamodt, William J. Dally
2015· article· en· ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
23
citations
affunlabeled
CODA
2018· article· en· ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
23
citations
affunlabeled
KernelFaRer
João P. L. de Carvalho, Braedy Kuzma, Ivan Korostelev, José Nelson Amaral, Christopher Barton, José E. Moreira +1 more
2021· article· en· ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
affunlabeled
Citadel
Prashant J. Nair, David Roberts, Moinuddin K. Qureshi
2016· article· en· ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
affunlabeled
Gretch
Anirudh Mohan Kaushik, Gennady Pekhimenko, Hiren Patel
2021· article· en· ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
affunlabeled
Practical Software-Based Shadow Stacks on x86-64
Changwei Zou, Yaoqing Gao, Jingling Xue
2022· article· en· ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations
affunlabeled
YaConv: Convolution with Low Cache Footprint
Ivan Korostelev, João P. L. de Carvalho, José E. Moreira, José Nelson Amaral
2022· article· en· ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations
afffundunlabeled
SIMT-X
Anita Tino, Caroline Collange, André Seznec
2020· article· en· ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
affunlabeled
rNdN: Fast Query Compilation for NVIDIA GPUs
Alexander Krolik, Clark Verbrugge, Laurie Hendren
2023· article· en· ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affunlabeled
CG-OoO
Milad Mohammadi, Tor M. Aamodt, William J. Dally
2017· article· en· ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
Byte-Select Compression
Matthew Tomei, Shomit Das, Seyed Mohammad Seyedzadeh, Philip Bedoukian, Bradford M. Beckmann, Rakesh Kumar +1 more
2021· article· en· ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
afffundunlabeled
Symbolic Analysis for Data Plane Programs Specialization
Thomas Luinaud, J. M. Pierre Langlois, Yvon Savaria
2022· article· en· ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Using Barrier Elision to Improve Transactional Code Generation
Bruno Chinelato Honorio, João P. L. de Carvalho, Catalina Muñoz Morales, Alexandro Baldassin, Guido Araújo
2022· article· en· ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About